Game Development Community

Committee Meeting Notes: 06/25/2013

by David Wyand · in Torque 3D Beginner · 06/25/2013 (12:36 pm) · 5 replies

Discussed This Week
  • Talked about the new Tracking Torque 3D Community Contributions blog.
  • Talked about the new Intended Community Contribution wiki page.
  • Went over new Pull Requests.
  • Mike is putting together a blog/resource about using GitHub. Unfortunately, his computer died and he is setting up a new one.
  • The modular template work was slow this week due to the GitHub blog/resource.
  • Talked some more about using opengameart.org as the place the Torque 3D community could post their donated art work. A tag of "Torque3D" should be used, and the art should be licensed under either the Creative Commons 3.0 or public domain licenses.
- Dave
David Wyand's profile picture
Associate David Wyand
Gnometech Inc.

About the author

A long time Associate of the GarageGames' community and author of the Torque 3D Game Development Cookbook. Buy it today from Packt Publishing!

Recent Threads

  • Bullet physics applyImpulse() trouble (and fix)
  • Committee Meeting Notes: 11/18/2013
  • Committee Meeting Notes: 11/11/2013
  • Committee Meeting Notes: 11/04/2013
  • Community QA Testing for v3.5
    • NextNext Thread
    PrevPrevious Thread
    More from Torque 3D Beginner


    J0linar
    #1
    06/25/2013 (12:47 pm)
    thx for the info
    opengameart for assets is fine
    will keep that in mind when i get my puppet out

    ....his computer died and he is setting up a new one.
    hell that reminds me i should plugin teh damn cooler


    Duion
    #2
    06/25/2013 (1:15 pm)
    Should add to use Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution license, not SA (Share-Alike), cause this is similar to other copyleft licenses like GPL and can be problematic.

    Associate Steve Acaster
    [YorkshireRifles.com]
    #3
    06/25/2013 (3:04 pm)
    Quote:
    his computer died

    *shudders in horror*

    Mine started going fruity last night too, so I backedup like a man possessed. Some tinkering and a scandisk later all seems well again ... hopefully ... :S

    And as Duion said, I'd think CC3.0A is best, not SA.

    Thanks for the update, Dave.

    I'm currently all hands to the pumps trying to get my project into shippable form and alas cannot help out.

    Associate David Wyand
    Gnometech Inc.
    #4
    06/25/2013 (3:21 pm)
    Hey Guys.

    Thanks for the clarification. CC3.0 Attribution it is! :)

    I didn't realize it was viral and thought it only applied to derived works of the original art asset.

    - Dave

    Duion
    #5
    06/25/2013 (3:33 pm)
    It is not so clear what it really means, some say only the art asset, some say the whole product derived from it.
    But I chose to go straight for CC-BY 3.0 to avoid confusion and because it is similar to MIT license and so pretty compatible.