Plan for Greg Findlay
by Greg Findlay · 08/19/2005 (6:26 pm) · 4 comments
As part of my final portfolio for school I'm required to make 5 pitch documents for games. These are simple one page docs that describe the essence of what a game is, gives a list of key features and breaks down the major feasibility issues. When I start with a game design I like to break down the restrictions of a game and come up with some questions that need to be answered to understand how you play the game. By answering these questions I want to know the goal of the game and who the intended audience is. So my idea for this project is to come up with the 'perfect' set of restrictions that publishers are looking for in a game and build 3 game ideas from that. For an example, here is what discussion in class has brought up so far (a lot of these are from the instructor):
- dynastry oriented (ie. can make sequels and/or sell merchandise from)
- is somehow community oriented (player extendable content, fanboism, etc)
- has some type of online feature
- has a potential economy beyond the game (publisher can sell additional content for the game)
- team based
- has some type of sandbox feature
- cinematic feel
- incorporates lisenced IP (has an existing fanbase)
The idea is that the more of the things in the list that get hit the more appealling the idea is to a publisher. This is by no means a comprehensive list and I'm welcome to any ideas anyone has that they think should be added.
The goal of this project (for me at least) is not to come up with some crazy game idea that I'm going to pitch to people, it's to impress a company enough to get a job.
- dynastry oriented (ie. can make sequels and/or sell merchandise from)
- is somehow community oriented (player extendable content, fanboism, etc)
- has some type of online feature
- has a potential economy beyond the game (publisher can sell additional content for the game)
- team based
- has some type of sandbox feature
- cinematic feel
- incorporates lisenced IP (has an existing fanbase)
The idea is that the more of the things in the list that get hit the more appealling the idea is to a publisher. This is by no means a comprehensive list and I'm welcome to any ideas anyone has that they think should be added.
The goal of this project (for me at least) is not to come up with some crazy game idea that I'm going to pitch to people, it's to impress a company enough to get a job.
About the author
Recent Blogs
• Cathedral: Week 4• Cathedral: Week 3
• Cathedral: Week 2
• Art project: Cathedral
• Plan for Greg Findlay
#2
There was a panel of game developers and publishers alike. This is what I got from the discussion.
Here's a couple of key things that publishers and companies look for.
1. A finished game. If you write your own tech - great. But nothing beats making a game. It shows that you stuck it through and finished the entire project. Nothing impresses a company/publisher more than commitment to a game (at least that's the impression I was given). This means developing with Torque doesn't seem like a bad route when it comes to attracting attention.
2. An ONLINE resume and webpage. That means if your going to sell yourself to publishers or a company, make sure it's electronic. Do NOT send tapes or something silly like that. They'll give it a toss. If you have a game, make sure it has a webpage featuring a demo, screenshots, etc.
3. The ability to handle business. This is a lesser requirement, but usually one person out of any team seems to be thrown into being the "buisness" guy (or gal). Being prepared for that sort of situation can't hurt. Being on time, reliable, confident in yourself and generally gaining trust with a potential employer and publisher is key to your success.
Hope it helps,
- Eric
08/19/2005 (8:21 pm)
If your goal is to attract the attention of a company or publisher, I might be of some help. I attended an IGDA meeting in Toronto on January where it was event basically discussing atrracting publishers, companies, and starting your own viable business.There was a panel of game developers and publishers alike. This is what I got from the discussion.
Here's a couple of key things that publishers and companies look for.
1. A finished game. If you write your own tech - great. But nothing beats making a game. It shows that you stuck it through and finished the entire project. Nothing impresses a company/publisher more than commitment to a game (at least that's the impression I was given). This means developing with Torque doesn't seem like a bad route when it comes to attracting attention.
2. An ONLINE resume and webpage. That means if your going to sell yourself to publishers or a company, make sure it's electronic. Do NOT send tapes or something silly like that. They'll give it a toss. If you have a game, make sure it has a webpage featuring a demo, screenshots, etc.
3. The ability to handle business. This is a lesser requirement, but usually one person out of any team seems to be thrown into being the "buisness" guy (or gal). Being prepared for that sort of situation can't hurt. Being on time, reliable, confident in yourself and generally gaining trust with a potential employer and publisher is key to your success.
Hope it helps,
- Eric
#3
@ Eric - Thanks for the tips. Goes a bit beyond what I was getting at here but it's definitely good advice.
The idea behind this self imposed excersize is to try and show developers that I have some knowledge of the industry and some interesting ideas to boot. Whether or not I'm successful we shall soon see. I'll be posting my result on the web once I'm done so anyone interested can take a quick read. If you've never done one of these before it might be useful just to check the format (I didn't invent it, our class got from a developer who pitches game docs to publishers). There's really no standard format but apparently this particular style has had some positive feedback.
08/19/2005 (10:03 pm)
@ Philip - Agreed, flashy graphics will only help the cause.@ Eric - Thanks for the tips. Goes a bit beyond what I was getting at here but it's definitely good advice.
The idea behind this self imposed excersize is to try and show developers that I have some knowledge of the industry and some interesting ideas to boot. Whether or not I'm successful we shall soon see. I'll be posting my result on the web once I'm done so anyone interested can take a quick read. If you've never done one of these before it might be useful just to check the format (I didn't invent it, our class got from a developer who pitches game docs to publishers). There's really no standard format but apparently this particular style has had some positive feedback.
#4
You want to show that you have a "hook" that is, a single or perhaps a couple of unique selling points that are the cornerstones to the game
You want to show WHY a publisher would want YOUR game rather than another one in a similar genre
Explain who the audience is and perhaps look up any historical sales figures for games of your genre.
There are lots of other things really. :)
08/20/2005 (12:27 pm)
You want to be able to explain the game in a single paragraph.You want to show that you have a "hook" that is, a single or perhaps a couple of unique selling points that are the cornerstones to the game
You want to show WHY a publisher would want YOUR game rather than another one in a similar genre
Explain who the audience is and perhaps look up any historical sales figures for games of your genre.
There are lots of other things really. :)
Torque Owner MrPhil (Philip J. Ludington)
Cutting edge graphics <-- "Oooooo, Aaahhhhh" effect
No interesting game play <-- The "Well, it looks pretty" effect a.k.a "No surprises please where spending REAL money here."