by date
60 Medieval Props Vol.1 (Torque DTS)
60 Medieval Props Vol.1 (Torque DTS)
| Name: | Vas | |
|---|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Jul 04, 2006 | |
| Rating: |  4.8 out of 5 | |
| Public: | YES | |
| Comments: | YES | |
| RSS Feed: |  or Subscribe with  . | |
| Profile Page: | View profile page for Vas |
Blog post
Not sure why my Dev. Snapshots doesn't get accepted. *cry*
Maybe i am to cheap?
Anyways New Medieval Props Pack (well one animated rat included as bonus :)
39$ use for comercial projects whatever u like.
PRODUCT PAGE
Vas
Maybe i am to cheap?
Anyways New Medieval Props Pack (well one animated rat included as bonus :)
39$ use for comercial projects whatever u like.
PRODUCT PAGE
Vas
Recent Blog Posts
| List: | 09/12/07 - Free animated lowpoly Monster + Tutorial 07/04/06 - 60 Medieval Props Vol.1 (Torque DTS) 07/01/06 - Animated Lowpoly Models |
|---|
Submit your own resources!| Peter Kojesta (Jul 04, 2006 at 15:24 GMT) |
Edit:
Apparently you are allowed to post in .plans afterall. Thanks for the info Tim.
Edited on Jul 04, 2006 22:35 GMT
| Jonathon Stevens (Jul 04, 2006 at 15:43 GMT) |
| Phil Carlisle (Jul 04, 2006 at 16:00 GMT) |
| Stefan Lundmark (Jul 04, 2006 at 16:14 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
Peter: That sucks. Only goes to show how this place has changed from what it was when I joined it.
Edited on Jul 04, 2006 16:17 GMT
| Chip Lambert (Jul 04, 2006 at 16:42 GMT) |
| Ben -Djaggernaut- Chavigner (Jul 04, 2006 at 16:47 GMT) |
Now I understand GG point as well. It's only fair for them and pack makers, to promote their own packs .It's an incoming source, and if we want more quality products and support, they need some funds :). A simple solution could be to publish the pack on GG..
Btw, you should change the background for your objects, it doesn't really emphasize them.
| David Montgomery-Blake (Jul 04, 2006 at 17:14 GMT) |
Quote:
Your dev shot does not get accepted because no one is allowed to advertise stuff on the main page if not directly related to GG. You're technically not supose to do it here either as I found out not too long ago.
I have no idea where you got that idea. The IOTD is there to showcase development products, whether in TGE or not.
I have no idea why the screenshot was not accepted, but being or not being a GG product had next to nothing to do with it, I'm sure. Otherwise the vast majority of the shots would not have been posted.
EDIT:
@Vas
The pack looks great. Are you going to include a version with source artwork? I would see benefit in rigging the rat and playing with the geometry. As simple as it is, I would like to play with the cart. Maybe that's just me.
EDIT #2:
Just noticed that it came with 3DS. I completely missed the text on the bottom of the screenshot. Nice!
Edited on Jul 04, 2006 17:18 GMT
| Peter Kojesta (Jul 04, 2006 at 17:29 GMT) |
-- Whoop, just got updated from on high, Apparently it's allowed in .plans.
- Peter
Edited on Jul 04, 2006 22:31 GMT
| Alexander "taualex" Gaevoy (Jul 04, 2006 at 17:51 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
Sad...
But I can understand them... As I can understand Google changing their slogan to something more "harmfulish"... Whatever...
| Jonathon Stevens (Jul 04, 2006 at 18:14 GMT) |
Even non-profit groups need to think about themselves once in ahwile.
| Anton Bursch (Jul 04, 2006 at 19:26 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
Maybe this is just a case of an GG employee talking shit in IRC. Sometimes they have bad days and do that. I asked for help a couple of days ago and was told that if I can't do it myself that I shouldn't be making games for a living. Class act. If this info was gained in IRC, those guys are probably just pissed off again. I mean, they hang out in irc all day. Who wouldn't get pissed. I can't believe that GG would really do something like that officially. Maybe the guy who picks the IOTD is making those decisions on his/her own. Empolyees do that all the time.
| Jesse (Midhir) Liles (Jul 04, 2006 at 19:36 GMT) |
| Aaron Ellis (Jul 04, 2006 at 19:55 GMT) |
This is somewhat off topic, but what happened to your last .plan? I read part of it yesterday and tried to finish it today, but apparently it had been deleted. Just curious.
| Ian \"Xest\" Winter (Jul 04, 2006 at 20:27 GMT) |
| Aaron Ellis (Jul 04, 2006 at 20:49 GMT) |
I guess I'll look for it in my browser cache. It was an interesting blog.
| Anton Bursch (Jul 04, 2006 at 21:34 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
Yeah, I advertised jobs not from GG and it pissed them off and they deleted it.
JUST KIDDING
LOL
I read a post that I could tell was going to lead the blog into a mess of a fight and that was not my intention, so, since I can't delete the post, I deleted the blog. :(
The point of the blog was to make people aware of the jobs coming in a few weeks. I only mentioned bad business sense because... well, it's true... but because learning the business of making games can be done on your own if you want to spend a 10 years doing it... or you can work for a company and learn from them in a year or two. then come back and make your own game. or hell, make your own commercial game with publisher funding. it's not so bad. there's a lot of shitty people out there, but there's also a lot of good people and the answer to fixing the industry isn't just to leave it... but it also would help to fill it with good people. That's my opinion.
| Peter Simard (Jul 04, 2006 at 21:59 GMT) |
| Aaron Ellis (Jul 04, 2006 at 22:03 GMT) |
Makes sense. Still liked what I read of it though -- it sounded like great advice for all of us. Maybe you could re-post it with comments turned off. Or that could cause more problems. -sigh-
Thanks for the info
| AndrewOsborne (Jul 04, 2006 at 23:03 GMT) |
Definately not the case - I received an email about my IOTD being taken down (content pack) due to GG not wanting to advertise 3rd party packs.
I belive its a pretty poor way of going about things, I can understand that they obviously dont want the IOTD being flooded with random guys coming in, but I have held a license to TGE since Feb 19, 2003... I would like to think that other longer term license holders like myself would want to give back to the community through offering art content/services where possible, and have GG facilitate that to an extent (not everyone wants to pay $40-50+ for content packs)
Edited on Jul 04, 2006 23:05 GMT
| Ian Roach (Jul 05, 2006 at 00:23 GMT) |
I remember when things like the scifi furniture pack where putup on IOTD . If it wasnt for it appearing there i would never have known about it (and subsequently purchased it).
We need more content packs , and not everyone can spend time going through every plan to weed out content pack details. Which is why i used to love the IOTD.
Anyway back to the original topic, great looking models.
Edited on Jul 05, 2006 00:24 GMT
| Anton Bursch (Jul 05, 2006 at 00:28 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
| Peter Simard (Jul 05, 2006 at 03:04 GMT) |
| J.C. Smith (Jul 05, 2006 at 05:09 GMT) |
| Jonathon Stevens (Jul 05, 2006 at 05:39 GMT) |
| Vas (Jul 05, 2006 at 05:59 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
@ Jonathon Stevens - i understand your request but atm i just dont have the time to do a complete list with a screenshot for each. I'm working full time on a game project for the causual game portals - the models i offer on my site is just a side job i do in my free time.
thanks
Vas
| Stefan Lundmark (Jul 05, 2006 at 08:07 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
I do agree with you though it should be the same everywhere, not just here. But this ain't the case as of today.
------------------------------------------
A question to Vas:
Doesn't this content pack include source art, like for the rat? I was interested in it. I can see how you listed 3DS but not .max or the native Lightwave formats.
Edited on Jul 05, 2006 12:00 GMT
| Aaron Ellis (Jul 05, 2006 at 13:33 GMT) |
Edited on Jul 05, 2006 19:10 GMT
| Alexander "taualex" Gaevoy (Jul 05, 2006 at 20:24 GMT) Resource Rating: 5 |
Edited on Jul 05, 2006 20:24 GMT
| Joshua Dallman (Jul 06, 2006 at 01:03 GMT) |
| David Montgomery-Blake (Jul 06, 2006 at 05:10 GMT) |
You must be a member and be logged in to either append comments or rate this resource.
