by date
Lion, and Tigers and Lawyers , ohh my!
Lion, and Tigers and Lawyers , ohh my!
| Name: | Rodney Rindels - Torqued | ![]() |
|---|---|---|
| Date Posted: | Sep 17, 2006 | |
| Rating: | Not Rated | |
| Public: | NO | |
| Comments: | YES | |
| RSS Feed: | or Subscribe with . | |
| Profile Page: | View profile page for Rodney Rindels - Torqued |
Blog post
I haven't posted in awhile, mostly because I have been advised not too. By the blood sucking vermon known as lawyers regarding my current project Capicu.
I being a professional programmer, on many types of projects, and as a gun to hire.. tend to enter into many agreements. Recently after leaving a project, I was told that I had to cease and assist on my current game project Capicu. Mainly because the company I just left thought they owned the rights to it. Because of the wording of one little clause .. "any and all development done under the time periods specified in this agreement, will be the ownership of blah, blah, blah.." I know I can beat them in court, but i'm not inclined to beat a dead horse, for a project only half done.
I purchased the TGB license out of my own pocket, and I was very careful to not work on it utilizing either their network, or thier computers, or on their time for any of the actual game development. The only consideration was they allowed me to host a small website on their internet servers. Which in retrospect, I'm kicking myself for taking them up on. So I have decided that the hundred or so hours I spent on that project I am going to chalk up to experience, and just turn it over. I dont have the resources, or time to fight them. Those who showed interest in the project, I can explain how I got some of the cool effects to work , just drop me an email. I wont post publically any technical specifications of the project.
The point to this blog, read the fine print, and argue the rights to addendums to modify the terms without going through the contract negotiations again. As part of those addendums, have an exclusion listing of the projects excluded under the terms of the contract, and make sure to be diligent in adding your new projects to that list.
Well on to the next thing..
--Torqued
I being a professional programmer, on many types of projects, and as a gun to hire.. tend to enter into many agreements. Recently after leaving a project, I was told that I had to cease and assist on my current game project Capicu. Mainly because the company I just left thought they owned the rights to it. Because of the wording of one little clause .. "any and all development done under the time periods specified in this agreement, will be the ownership of blah, blah, blah.." I know I can beat them in court, but i'm not inclined to beat a dead horse, for a project only half done.
I purchased the TGB license out of my own pocket, and I was very careful to not work on it utilizing either their network, or thier computers, or on their time for any of the actual game development. The only consideration was they allowed me to host a small website on their internet servers. Which in retrospect, I'm kicking myself for taking them up on. So I have decided that the hundred or so hours I spent on that project I am going to chalk up to experience, and just turn it over. I dont have the resources, or time to fight them. Those who showed interest in the project, I can explain how I got some of the cool effects to work , just drop me an email. I wont post publically any technical specifications of the project.
The point to this blog, read the fine print, and argue the rights to addendums to modify the terms without going through the contract negotiations again. As part of those addendums, have an exclusion listing of the projects excluded under the terms of the contract, and make sure to be diligent in adding your new projects to that list.
Well on to the next thing..
--Torqued
Recent Blog Posts
| List: | 11/27/06 - Tri Poker Plus 09/17/06 - Lion, and Tigers and Lawyers , ohh my! 07/18/06 - TGB Memory Game Demo 06/12/06 - Capicu - Street Rules Dominoes 06/08/06 - TGB - Game in a Day 06/03/06 - T2d A (star) pathfinding almost a reality. 05/31/06 - T2D Pause Screen |
|---|
Submit your own resources!| Stephan (viKKing) Bondier (Sep 17, 2006 at 22:28 GMT) |
You don't even need such an agreement in France. Any job done within "legal" worked time are property of your boss. That's a work rule, they don't need agreement to be signed to p**s you off.
Can't you mess the code to death?
STef
| Alexander "taualex" Gaevoy (Sep 17, 2006 at 23:20 GMT) |
My 2 cents.
| Anton Bursch (Sep 17, 2006 at 23:31 GMT) |
He decided that they needed to cut some cost quick because they were over their heads after not getting that grant. He decided to try to back out of paying me. This was still early on for me, so, I didn't understand the importants of stipulations in contracts. I hadn't specified exactly what the application would be and he tried to pull a fast one and say that he hadn't authorized most of the work I had done and that it wasn't in a written agreement so they weren't going to pay for it.
Now, that second half of the payment was for a month worth of work. Not getting paid for it was really going to screw me over. I told them how bad it was for them to try to do something like this, but as far as I could see they could get away with it. So, what did I do?
I went home, logged onto their internet/intranet servers, and I deleted all of the work I had done for them. Everything... it essentially shut them and all of the satellite offices who were now using my application for all of the company data down. If they weren't going to pay, they sure as hell weren't going to keep my work. I didn't care if it totally screwed them over, they screwed me first. Then I went and took a nap.
A couple hours later the phone woke me up and they had my checks ready for me. Boy were they nice to me and even a little shaken when I saw them. I put the work back on their servers. And they learned an important lesson:
Don't fuck over the person who is the only one who knows how your shit works.
It's right up there with: don't fuck with people who prepare your food for you.
| Rex (Sep 17, 2006 at 23:43 GMT) |
| Mark Berry (Sep 18, 2006 at 01:40 GMT) |
Contracts can be a bitch, and most are needlessly wordy. I always feel that if a contract is very long, there must be something hidden in it, and distrust the people wanting me to sign it and so pay extra attention.
All my contracts are plain english and fit on a single page.
Although I would not go to Antons lengths, I have had to threaten to remove work I have done before, and that has always done the trick. At the bottom of every invoice or quote, it says that the goods belong to me until FULLY paid for.
If anyone is interested, I have some contracts I could probably share that have worked well for me, but then I'm not a solicitor :-)
| Anton Bursch (Sep 18, 2006 at 07:58 GMT) |
| Rodney Rindels - Torqued (Sep 18, 2006 at 11:34 GMT) |
But like I said, I just wanted indies to be aware, even if your hurting for revenue, dont rush into signing contracts without really reading them first and taking some solid due diligence into consideration. Most of the time you dont need a lawyer if you can read, and have the ability to negotiate some T's and C's. But if the contracts are long and have losts of injunction clauses, etc. It should only cost a few hundred bucks to get it reviewed by a legal "vampire" before entering into the agreement.
| Doug Linley (Sep 18, 2006 at 14:17 GMT) |
Mark - I would love to the see the contracts you'd be willing to share. you can reach me at doug.linley@cabalgames.com.
Rodney - Get back into the IRC channel sometime :)
| Anton Bursch (Sep 18, 2006 at 14:26 GMT) |
I'm glad you posted this. That's one bad thing about business... greedy self-centered assholes. This may be an industry that makes fun, but it's filled with people who want would sell their own children for a buck.
| Jonathon Stevens (Sep 18, 2006 at 18:39 GMT) |
@Stephan, Alexander - You should never maliciously remove code or break code that you deliver to them or that they are going to use. Even if YOU owned the code that you did this to, they could sue you and in most states would win. Be the bigger person and either sue them or move on.
@Anton - A bit drastic, but I'm glad it worked out for you in the end. Like I said above, this is a sticky situation that could go from a guaranteed win on your end to a guaranteed win on theirs based on your actions. Two wrongs don't make a right. (I'll leave the stupid directional puns out this time =D) In all fairness, Rodney signed the contract that stated they'd own the work, so he has no right to attempt to take that work. If he didn't read that section, no one is to blame but him. The people funding (I'm guessing they were funding it) the project might not have funded it had they not retained control.
My contracts are usually 5 - 8 pages in length with a detailed work agreement outlining anything major or semi-major and many smaller points of what I'm going to develop. Be particular and get it in writing or you'll end up on the wrong side of the stick.
@Mark - long wordy contracts aren't just from people who are trying to take advantage of others, they are there to clearly define what's expected so NO ONE is surprised by an outcome that's legal.
| Anton Bursch (Sep 18, 2006 at 22:20 GMT) |
Not letting someone steal my hardwork by taking it back from them is a right not a wrong. It's not wrong to take back what is yours. Though, like I said, now I would have gone the less direct route and sued them. But what I did was the same as a store owner grabbing a stolen item out of the hands of a thief. It's not wrong to not let someone steal from you. If they had a gun to my head(like a mugging), sure, I would have happily walked away. But they were just a big company who thought they could take advantage of one single person. It was all a bluff from them. I called it. I got my payment and they got to keep the work they hired me for. But again, today, I would sue them. No questions.
| Jonathon Stevens (Sep 18, 2006 at 22:41 GMT) |
Just so you are clear of my intentions, as you seem to think I'm saying what they did was right, I don't agree with what they did. I don't say what you did was morally or in MY mind wrong. What I think and believe doesn't make a damn in a court of law. They have laws set up to stop people from doing what you did, even if you and everyone who knows the situation thinks you were justified. I'm merely saying "don't risk it" and sue them next time as you said you would =).
Edit: And about lawyers being 'vampires', well not all are. If it weren't for lawyers, no software would be safe, most companies wouldn't exist, etc. etc.
Edited on Sep 18, 2006 22:42 GMT
| Anton Bursch (Sep 19, 2006 at 00:27 GMT) |
yeah, i'd never pull code again. and i'll never work without a firm contract ever again either.
| Andrew Douglas (Sep 19, 2006 at 01:14 GMT) |
I could also go on and on about a flat tax versus an income tax, too... or a whole range of other rants, but the point being - the legal system in the country is a self-perpetuating and largely unchecked oligarchy. The best way, that I can see, to accomplish any kind of change is for people to reduce their demand for lawyers... read your own contracts for example... Don't sue people is another. It may seem idealistic or simple-minded but the fewer suits, the fewer lawyers that are needed... and if nothing else, this country has proven time and time again that capitalism and a (mostly) free market generally will win out in time. I don't want a world without lawyers, I just want a world where lawyers aren't responsible for billions of dollars in frivolous law suits every year and millions of hours of wasted time and energy that could be better spent pursuing ... well... anything but silly law suits.
Okay, I'm off my soap box. Sorry. Move along. Nothing to see here. :)
-Andrew
[edit: billions, not trillions.. sorry got carried away. Tort in the US is about 2.2% of the gdp, which I believe comes out to about $275 billion per year)
Edited on Sep 19, 2006 01:26 GMT
| Alan Hembra (Sep 19, 2006 at 15:28 GMT) |
Anyway, that is the one clause almost every company has and I've always hated it. It should say that you work on while they are paying you. It should never include your after hours work. My opinion of course.
| Ben Ewing (Sep 19, 2006 at 23:17 GMT) |
IT was realy awesome looking....
Maybe you could screw it up, or make it do something realy annoying before you hand it over...
You must be a member and be logged in to either append comments or rate this resource.



Not Rated


