Previous Blog Next Blog
Prev/Next Blog
by date

Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack

Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
Name:Trent "mittens" Polack
Date Posted:Jul 30, 2005
Rating:4.0 out of 5
Public:YES
Comments:YES
RSS Feed:GarageGames Blog feedor Subscribe with .
Profile Page:View profile page for Trent "mittens" Polack

Blog post
Editorial: Developer Gas Powered Games has spent 3-4 years developing Dungeon Siege 2, and throughout all that time, very little effort was spent upgrading the graphics engine, and instead GPG (headed by legendary Chris Taylor) focused all their time improving gameplay - something that they should be greatly rewarded for.
2005 is a great year for gamers as a whole, with the release of the highly-touted Xbox 360 headlining the news (and, consequently, the temporally inferior PS3) for the brutes of the gaming crowd and new graphics card technology and big-name game titles for the intellectually elite [Ha.] PC gamers. Far and wide the most important event of 2005 is the release of Gas Powered Games' Dungeon Siege 2, the sequel to the relatively under-appreciated original game of the same name, one of my top titles of all time. It is only through my striking ability of clarity, along with my tendency to avoid any type of "fanboyism" that I can say that the under-appreciation of the original game was quite well-deserved. The game was able to present the user with an absolutely gorgeously organized array of colored pixels for its time but, alas, the game was more of a visual spectacle than a well-designed gameplay-centric phenomenon.


Yeah, it was basically a mildly interactive screensaver. And I say this with love.

Not content to be just another roof housing cheap imitation game developers, Gas Powered Games instantly set to work on making the sequel to their beloved Dungeon Siege franchise (while plotting the mind-blowingly sexy Supreme Commander, of course). I've personally been following the development of Dungeon Siege 2 since the moment it was announced, taking in each newly released screenshot and interview with a bit of my inner-fanboy emerging with every new screenshot pixel or interview letter.

However many years later, and Gas Powered Games makes the announcement I've been waiting for: it went gold. And take a look at those screenshots (Or the ones from my DS2 gallery)... Wait, what has Gas Powered Games doing doing all these years? What the hell? This game isn't new. What the hell. They didn't change anything. What the hell!

What you've been absorbing is the best example of a game being released where the development company has all the resources of every other game development company around and uses them to... make a better game? That's right. Almost three-four years in development under the guiding powers of the infamous Chris Taylor (of Total Annihilation fame), Gas Powered Games now prepares to release the sequel to their Dungeon Siege franchise for the video gaming consumption of rabid gamers everywhere. And in these three years in development, the graphics engine was hardly touched at all. Sure the textures are crisper and some shader effects were thrown in, but the graphics engine for Dungeon Siege 2 is essentially the same one we all saw in the first game. This is one of the best instances I've ever seen where a developer has actually decided to divert their focus from the much criticized "graphics over gameplay" path that a lot of developers take, and instead focus almost all of their time trying to make their game world seem more alive through details while simultaneously spending time to make the actual gameplay perfect. Three years in development, and we get what Chris Taylor says "is the closest to perfection I've ever come on any game I've done!" Bold words from a game designer said to revolutionize the real-time strategy genre with Total Annihilation.

And here's where the point comes in: gamers are already up-in-arms about Dungeon Siege 2. And not about the developer's immense focus on detail and gameplay, but rather about the developer's lack of time spent upgrading the graphics engine. Comments I've seen from average gamers across a number of sites chastise Gas Powered Games (though, not directly of course, that would require backbone and thought) for releasing a game in 2005 that looks "so bad," yet go on to complain about the original game being a "screensaver." The nerve of Gas Powered Games! What were they thinking when they were following the ideal that so many critical editorials and articles express their fears that games are becoming so technologically advanced that the gameplay begins to suffer. What on Earth were they thinking in actually spending time trying to perfect their new game's gameplay instead of focusing on visuals?

And there's the beauty of this industry folks: graphics make the game. Despite whatever article on any game development, game review, or game-related website or periodical may say, at the end of the day, a game simply cannot be released these days unless it's using a shader model higher than any graphics card can support, unless it is taking advantage of HDR lighting, lens flares, per-pixel lighting, physically accurate shadows, mega-detailed textures, and super-shiny rough wooden surfaces (because that's totally realistic, dude). Nobody wants to play a visually par game anymore; hell, take a look at Battlefield 2. A ridiculously popular game, yet, it's released months before it should have been so buyers can function as beta testers, and with requirements that alienate anybody without the latest and greatest graphics cards. The video game industry is an industry well-versed in gamer hypocrisy, and the developers acknowledge it when they release games like Battlefield 2, Half-Life 2 (it's not a good game, I'm sorry), and DOOM 3.

If gamers really do mean it when they say that they would rather have a visually sub-par game with excellent gameplay, then let's all put our money where our mouth is. Buy games like Dungeon Siege 2. Reward the developers for releasing a great game and focusing on what really matters to gamers everywhere: the gameplay. I will be buying Dungeon Siege 2 as soon as I possibly can, and not only to support the developer's focus on gameplay, but because I think their laser-like focus and precision during the development of Dungeon Siege 2 has resulted in one of the best action/RPGs in gaming history being released on August 16th, 2005.

Recent Blog Posts
List:09/06/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
08/08/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
07/30/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
07/20/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
07/19/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
07/16/05 - Plan for Trent "mittens" Polack
07/15/05 - Plan for Trent Polack

Submit ResourceSubmit your own resources!

Rodney (OldRod) Burns   (Jul 30, 2005 at 00:16 GMT)
I applaud GPG for this. Far too many games these days focus on the bleeding edge eye candy and leave out the *fun* stuff that makes me want to play. I've had more fun in the past year digging out old games that I couldn't play when they were released because my computer was sub-par back then. The original Half-Life, Doom2, etc. (yes my computer sucked back then) Games like that are just plain fun to play - and that's what it's about after all.

I hadn't planned on buying DS2, because I figured it was more of the same upgraded graphics that my P4 couldn't run... after reading this, I probably will buy it. Thanks for posting this :)

Ryan Ackley   (Jul 30, 2005 at 00:26 GMT)
I agree with rodney. While I actually liked the first DS (never played the expansion, but, as a funny aside, a friend of mine worked as a tester on that one up at mad doc). I've done nothing but console gaming for nearly a year (except doom 3, dont remind me), and now I want to play this. According to ebgames.com, ships on aug 16. I hold my applause for my own play through, but like the direction GPG has seemed to take. I hope they do another post morterm in game developer, that is still one of my favorite writeups.

Trent "mittens" Polack   (Jul 30, 2005 at 00:56 GMT)
The post-mortem from GDMag was the reason I tried playing through Dungeon Siege again in the first place. I was merely of the "meh" feeling of the game (it ran really buggy and fairly slow on the computer when I first got the game when it came out), but after reading the post-mortem, I decided to reinstall it, and I found a far richer gameplay experience than I ever remembered from the first time.

I still haven't beaten it though, due to bad luck I keep losing my saved games when I try to play.'

Great comments so far though, thanks guys.

Thomas Natale   (Jul 30, 2005 at 01:18 GMT)   Resource Rating: 5
I agree with the whole thing... It's annoying when kids bash games just because the graphics aren't cutting edge, or even appear pretty. I'll definitely buy DS2 if I get the chance.

Anton Bursch   (Jul 30, 2005 at 01:38 GMT)
Great read Mittens! You got me excited!

Ryan Ackley   (Jul 30, 2005 at 01:51 GMT)
Just the other day i was thinking about reinstalling the first game (its in a list of older games that i feel i need to play again. Others include system shock 2, alice, and, um, shoot. i know there was at least one more) With the sequel golden, ill have to put in some more OT so i can afford an upgrade to my PC so i can play it :)

Jay Barnson   (Jul 30, 2005 at 16:50 GMT)
Well, I've always liked Chris Taylor. Now my estimation of him has improved substantially. Proof will be in the final deliverable, of course, but I'm looking forward to it.

Here's the thing: Yes, he's gonna take flack for it. But if we have a few more people jumping off the "graphics" bandwagon --- not STOPPING progress in quality and technology of graphics, mind you, just not letting it drive the game --- then we'll have a trend. It's GOTTA happen sooner or later - the apparent visual quality of graphics isn't improving at the same rate it was 10 years ago (but the budget and time and tools and technology required for each incremental improvement sure is skyrocketing).

You must be a member and be logged in to either append comments or rate this resource.